Page 151 - GHR_NursingCMU2024_Final.indd
P. 151

A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of the CAPD for Detecting Pediatric
           Intensive Care Unit Delirium


                    1
           I. Rohmah  and H. Chiu 1

           Taipei Medical University, Chinese Taipei
           1

           Background: Delirium is a complication related to critical illness, affecting 34% of children admitted
           to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is the
           commonly used assessment tool for detecting pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) delirium. To date, no
           study has examined the diagnostic accuracy of the CAPD for screening PICU delirium. Furthermore,
           the moderating effects of study features and patient characteristics on diagnostic accuracy of the
           tool remained unanswered.


           Objective: We aimed to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the tool in the detection of delirium in
           pediatric intensive care units.


           Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and
                                                                                                                      Oral Presentation Abstracts
           ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I were used to conduct a thorough search from the database’s
           inception to March 1, 2023. The study examined the sensitivity and specificity of CAPD in relation to gold
           standards such as the DSM and clinical observation for delirium screening in PICUs. Two researchers
           independently identified articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for each study by
           using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). A bivariate diagnostic
           statistical analysis with a random-effects model was performed. The funnel plot proposed by Deeks
           was employed to assess the presence of publication bias.


           Results: Seven studies for the CAPD were identified. All studies had a low risk of bias in applicability.
           The pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI:0.85-0.99) while pooled specificity was 0.81 (95% CI:0.68-0.90).
           Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed in the pooled sensitivity and specificity
           (Q = 20.44 and 55.46, both p < 0.001; I2 = 70.64% and 89.18%, respectively). We did not identify any
           variable explaining heterogeneity for the CAPD. Deeks’ funnel plot revealed no evidence of significant
           publication bias (p > 0.01).


           Conclusion: The CAPD is an accurate assessment tool for screening delirium in critically ill pediatric
           patients.


           Keywords: critical care, delirium, pediatric intensive care delirium screening checklist


           _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
           Correspondence: Hsiao-Yean Chiu, Taipei Medical University, Chinese Taipei
           E-mail: hychiu0315@tmu.edu.tw







                                                                                                             149
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156