Page 123 - GHR_NursingCMU2024_Final.indd
P. 123

Diagnostic Accuracy of Frailty Measurement Tools on Frailty Assessment in
           Cancer Patients: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis


                    1
           D. Apriadi  and H. Huang 1

           College of Nursing/School of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Chinese Taipei
           1

           Background: The questionnaire-based method is commonly used for a rapid assessment of
           individuals with frailty. However, the appropriate scale for identifying frail cases in the cancer
           population remains unclear.


           Objective: This meta-analysis was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of three
           questionnaire-based tools (i.e., Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and
           Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) for screening frailty in the cancer population.


           Methods: Five electronic databases, including the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health
           Literature, Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and ProQuest, were searched from their inception until
           January 20, 2024. Study quality, encompassing risks of bias and applicability, was evaluated using a
                                                                                                                      Oral Presentation Abstracts
           QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate meta-analysis with random-effects model was adopted to calculate the
           pooled sensitivity and specificity of the frailty assessment tools and subgroup and meta-regression
           analysis were performed to explain the sources of observed heterogeneity among studies.


           Results: Fifteen studies, examining the diagnostic accuracy of the TFI (n=1), GFI (n = 4), and VES-13
           (n = 12) for assessing frailty, were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of GFI were 67% and
           81%, and the VES-13 was 65% and 81%, respectively. Significant moderators of a percentage of male,
           and high prevalence of frailty may effect the estimation of the sensitivity or specificity of the frailty
           assessment tools.


           Conclusion: The GFI and VES-13 were shown have high specificity in identifying frailty, yet both had low
           sensitivity. These findings suggest the need for increased awareness and understanding of the health
           context or risk factors among cancer patients. Raising awareness of the importance of more regular
           check-ups and increased attention to early detection of frailty symptoms is crucial. Since available
           frailty screening methods have insufficient discriminative power to make better judgements for
           further assessment.


           Keywords: cancer, frailty, frailty assessment, frailty measurement tools, meta-analysis


           _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
           Correspondence: Hui-Chuan Huang, College of Nursing/School of Nursing, Taipei Medical University,
           Chinese Taipei
           E-mail: huichuan@tmu.edu.tw







                                                                                                             121
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128